Kevin Warsh Fed Chair Nomination
Kevin Warsh Fed Chair Nomination raises odds of faster balance-sheet reduction and bank deregulation, heightening policy uncertainty and trader volatility.
KEY TAKEAWAYS
- President announced intent to nominate Kevin Warsh as Fed chair on Jan. 30, 2026.
- DOJ opened a criminal probe of Jerome Powell with grand-jury subpoenas served Jan. 9-10, 2026.
- Senate pledge to block confirmations creates a roadblock, leaving policy to swing between faster tightening or prolonged uncertainty.
HIGH POTENTIAL TRADES SENT DIRECTLY TO YOUR INBOX
Add your email to receive our free daily newsletter. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.
President Trump announced on Jan. 30, 2026, his intent to nominate Kevin Warsh as Federal Reserve Chair, signaling a potential shift toward tighter policy, bank deregulation, and increased market volatility.
Nomination and Timing
Trump made the announcement on his Truth Social platform. Warsh served as a Federal Reserve governor from 2006 to 2011. Jerome Powell’s term as Fed Chair expires in May 2026, though his Federal Reserve governor term extends through January 2028.
Policy Direction and Confirmation Risks
The Justice Department opened a criminal investigation into Powell in November 2025 over possible false statements to Congress regarding a $2.5 billion Federal Reserve headquarters renovation that was not taxpayer funded. Grand-jury subpoenas were served on the Fed on Jan. 9–10, 2026, but no charges had been filed as of January.
Senator Thom Tillis (R-N.C.) has pledged to block all Fed nominations, including the chair, until the Powell probe concludes, posing a significant Senate confirmation hurdle. Oral arguments on Jan. 21, 2026, in Trump v. Cook addressed presidential authority to remove Fed governors, a legal issue that could affect leadership continuity.
Warsh is viewed as a hawkish former governor who opposed quantitative easing and is likely to advocate rapid Fed balance-sheet reduction. At the same time, he favors easing Wall Street bank regulations, a stance seen as loosening post-crisis constraints. This combination has prompted market recalibration of policy and regulatory expectations.
The nomination presents a dual risk: faster tightening under Warsh if confirmed or prolonged uncertainty if Senate opposition delays leadership change amid the ongoing legal overhang.
