MSGS Spin-Off Plan to Split Knicks and Rangers
MSGS spin-off exploration could trigger a re-rating and shift investor flows as separate Knicks and Rangers comps draw distinct valuations.

KEY TAKEAWAYS
- Board approved exploring a tax-free, pro-rata MSGS spin-off separating the Knicks and Rangers.
- Third-party estimates put the Knicks and Rangers near $13.0-$14.0 billion combined, versus MSGS's $7.0 billion EV.
- Guggenheim calculated MSGS shares would need an 84.0% to 94.0% premium to align with those valuations.
HIGH POTENTIAL TRADES SENT DIRECTLY TO YOUR INBOX
Add your email to receive our free daily newsletter. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.
Madison Square Garden Sports Corp. (MSGS) said on Feb. 18, 2026, that its board unanimously approved exploring a tax-free spin-off to separate the New York Knicks and New York Rangers into two focused public companies, aiming to unlock shareholder value.
Board Approves Spin-Off Exploration
The board approved a plan to distribute shares of the two new companies pro rata to existing MSGS shareholders. The Knicks spin-off would include the NBA franchise and its G League affiliate, the Westchester Knicks. The Rangers spin-off would hold the NHL club and the AHL Hartford Wolf Pack.
The company said the transaction requires approvals from both the NBA and NHL, as well as further board signoffs before proceeding.
Valuation Gap and Strategic Rationale
MSGS had an enterprise value of about $7.0 billion at market close on Feb. 17, 2026. Third-party estimates value the Knicks at roughly $9.9 billion and the Rangers at about $3.7 billion, placing combined franchise valuations near $13.0 billion to $14.0 billion.
A Guggenheim analysis calculated that MSGS shares would need an 84.0% to 94.0% premium to align with those valuations. Management said the spin-off would provide each franchise with a defined business focus and clearer investment characteristics. They also noted the separation could facilitate minority-stake sales, making each asset more comparable to peers and potentially closing the valuation gap between public-market pricing and private-market appraisals.





