Goldman Sachs General Counsel Resigns
Goldman Sachs general counsel resigns after DOJ-released Epstein files showed emails and gifts, raising governance and reputation questions for investors.

KEY TAKEAWAYS
- Ruemmler will resign effective June 30, 2026, after DOJ-released Epstein-file disclosures.
- DOJ tranche included roughly 3 million documents showing emails and gifts tied to Epstein.
- Disclosed exchanges raised questions about Goldman Sachs gifts policy and governance controls.
HIGH POTENTIAL TRADES SENT DIRECTLY TO YOUR INBOX
Add your email to receive our free daily newsletter. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.
Goldman Sachs general counsel Kathryn Ruemmler will resign effective June 30, 2026, following the Justice Department’s January 30 release of Epstein-related files that included emails referring to Jeffrey Epstein as "Uncle Jeffrey" and messages thanking him for gifts.
Departure Follows DOJ Disclosure of Epstein Emails and Gifts
Ruemmler has served as Goldman Sachs’s chief legal officer and general counsel since 2020, co-chairing the firm’s reputational-risk committee. She announced her resignation, publicly attributed to media distraction over her prior professional ties to Epstein as a criminal-defense client. The bank defended Ruemmler, with senior leadership praising her tenure and contributions.
The Justice Department’s late-January disclosure included roughly 3 million Epstein-related documents, among them emails under the names "Kathy Ruemmler" or "K Ruemer." These messages referred to Epstein as "Uncle Jeffrey" and expressed thanks for gifts such as handbags, boots, a watch, and a fur coat sent in 2018 and 2019. The gifts were received after Epstein’s 2008 sex-offender conviction and violated Goldman Sachs’s preapproval rules, raising questions about the firm’s gifts policy.
The documents also show Epstein called Ruemmler on the night of his 2019 arrest and named her as a backup executor of his will. While defenders characterized the ties as professional, the resignation and disclosed exchanges present governance and reputational challenges for shareholders. Investors are likely to scrutinize the implications for board oversight, internal controls, and compliance programs.





