David Tepper Whirlpool Letter Demands Board Action
David Tepper Whirlpool letter said management destroyed value with a dilutive equity issuance and urged a board review, increasing investor scrutiny.

KEY TAKEAWAYS
- Appaloosa sent a Feb. 25, 2026 letter demanding Whirlpool's board act after a dilutive equity issuance.
- Appaloosa holds about a 7% stake valued at $282 million at the end of 2025.
- The letter said the equity raise cost exceeded 10% versus tax-adjusted debt under 5%.
HIGH POTENTIAL TRADES SENT DIRECTLY TO YOUR INBOX
Add your email to receive our free daily newsletter. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.
Appaloosa LP, led by David Tepper, sent a letter to Whirlpool Corp’s (WHR) board on Feb. 25, 2026, accusing a recent equity issuance of unnecessary dilution and urging the board to pursue partnerships or mergers to restore shareholder value.
Appaloosa’s Call for Board Response and Equity Issuance Details
Appaloosa holds about a 7% stake in Whirlpool, making it the company’s third-largest institutional owner after BlackRock and Vanguard. That stake was valued at $282 million at the end of 2025.
In its letter, Appaloosa sharply criticized Whirlpool’s management for destroying hundreds of millions in shareholder value. It singled out the recent equity issuance as a key failure, saying the financing cost exceeded 10%, while the company’s debt trades at a tax-adjusted cost below 5%. The letter described the equity move as unnecessary dilution.
Appaloosa urged the board to fulfill its fiduciary duties by seeking interest from domestic or foreign entities that would create American jobs and increase shareholder value. It argued that management had failed to leverage Trump administration tariffs to benefit U.S. operations.
Whirlpool did not comment on the letter.
The equity issuance raised about $455 million through common stock and roughly $508 million via depositary shares. It included a placement of 435,000 shares at $69 each to Guangdong Whirlpool Electrical Appliances.
Appaloosa’s public demand, combined with its sizable stake, increases pressure on Whirlpool’s board to reassess capital allocation after the dilutive offering and to consider the strategic partnerships or mergers the letter advocates.





